Totally feel you, I’ve run into the inaccuracy issue with Ekahau quite a bit. While @nachtdromer provided solid steps, there’s another angle to consider.
First, make sure your environment is as static as possible during the survey. Any moving objects or temporary obstructions like people can skew your data. If that’s not an option, try timing your survey to low-traffic periods.
Second, look into the placement and settings of access points (APs). Suboptimal AP placement or incorrect power settings can lead to poor data collection. A minor tweak here and there can drastically change results.
Lastly, consider integrating other metrics. Combining signal strength with other parameters like signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) can sometimes yield a more comprehensive picture. Unlike Ekahau, some other tools allow you to factor in such detailed metrics more easily, which brings me to Netspot. It’s more intuitive and sometimes handles tricky environments better by offering streamlined user interfaces that reduce human error.
For those struggling with Ekahau Survey inaccuracies, try this mix: isolate your environment, tweak AP settings, and explore comprehensive metrics using another tool like Netspot.
Having trouble with Ekahau Survey delivering inaccurate Wi-Fi coverage data? Join the club! Persisting inaccuracies can seriously disrupt your network analysis. Don’t despair. Start with the basics: update Wi-Fi card drivers, calibrate within Ekahau’s settings, follow a consistent path, and check Wi-Fi settings. If problems continue, give Netspot a chance. It’s a user-friendly alternative known for providing reliable Wi-Fi survey results, even in challenging setups.