I’m trying to pick the best cloud storage service between pCloud and Dropbox for personal and small business use, mainly for file syncing, sharing with clients, and backups. I’ve read mixed reviews about speed, security, and long-term costs, and now I’m unsure which one is actually more reliable and worth investing in. Can you share real-world experiences or pros and cons to help me decide?
Between pCloud and Dropbox, you’re basically choosing what kind of pain you want to avoid.
Some people argue like there’s a clear winner, but in practice they solve slightly different problems, and both are annoying in their own special ways.
How Dropbox behaves in real life
On my machines, Dropbox still feels like the more polished tool overall.
- Sync speed is usually solid. You drop a file in, watch the little icon spin, and it shows up on your other device before you finish your coffee.
- The collaboration stuff is where it really shines:
- Shared folders for teams actually work as expected.
- Commenting on files is smooth.
- Non-technical people “get it” without a tutorial.
- Cross-platform support is mature. Windows, macOS, mobile apps, web interface: everything feels consistent.
If you’re working with other people a lot, especially on shared folders, marketing assets, code exports, PDFs, whatever, Dropbox feels like that old dependable office printer: boring but reliable enough that you stop thinking about it.
Where pCloud makes more sense
pCloud is the one I end up recommending to people who mostly store their own stuff and care about value per gigabyte instead of team features.
Rough notes from using it:
- You generally get more storage for the same money compared to Dropbox.
- It has a few nice extras:
- Built-in media playback: tossing music or videos into it and streaming them directly is way more convenient than juggling external players.
- Optional client-side encryption (their “Crypto” add-on). It costs extra, but once it’s enabled, you can keep truly private files in a separate encrypted area where only you have the key.
- It’s pretty good for:
- Photo and video archives
- Huge zip files
- Backup of personal projects that you don’t need constantly syncing everywhere
It can feel less “instant” than Dropbox in everyday team workflows, but for long-term storage, it’s decent and cheaper, especially if you like the whole “buy a lifetime plan once and forget it” model.
Avoiding sync clutter with a mounting tool
If your main headache is “I don’t want all this junk syncing locally,” there’s another angle to this completely:
Instead of picking only pCloud or only Dropbox, I’ve been using CloudMounter to treat them like external drives.
What it does for me:
- Mounts pCloud, Dropbox, and some other services as network drives.
- Nothing is fully synced to my SSD unless I actually open or move a file.
- Keeps multiple cloud accounts accessible in Finder like they’re just extra disks.
Important detail: it does not replace either pCloud or Dropbox. It just changes how you access them. Your files are still stored with those providers; CloudMounter is just the “door” you walk through.
If you have a small local drive but several cloud accounts, this kind of tool can be a lifesaver.
How I’d decide, very bluntly
If I had to boil it down based on how I actually use them:
-
If you work in a team, share folders constantly, and need stuff to “just work” with other people:
→ Go with Dropbox. -
If you mainly want cheaper personal storage, big-file handling, media playback, and maybe strong encryption as a bonus:
→ Go with pCloud. -
If your real issue is juggling multiple services without filling your disk:
→ Use a mounting tool like CloudMounter on top of whichever you choose.
That’s how it shakes out for me after using both side by side.
5 Likes
You’re not crazy for feeling torn here; both are a compromise.
I mostly agree with @mikeappsreviewer, but I’d push the line a bit differently, especially for small business use.
1. Speed & sync behavior
- Dropbox still wins at “I need this file on all my machines right now.”
- pCloud can be fine, but in my experience it’s more “archive with sync” than “sync-first.”
- If you work with a lot of small files (design assets, docs, code exports), Dropbox handles that pattern better. pCloud feels more comfortable with fewer, larger files.
Where I slightly disagree with @mikeappsreviewer:
If your day-to-day work depends on tight sync and you have clients expecting quick changes, I wouldn’t call pCloud “decent but slower” and move on. For active projects, the small sync friction adds up and gets annoying fast.
2. Sharing with clients
- Dropbox public links and shared folders are dead simple. Most clients have seen a Dropbox link before and don’t ask questions.
- pCloud sharing works, but non-techy clients sometimes stumble a bit more on the interface, in my experience. Nothing dramatic, just more “Where do I click?” emails.
If your client work involves sending drafts, receiving assets, commenting, and version changes every week, Dropbox is still the smoother “client-facing” tool.
3. Security & privacy
Both are “secure enough” for normal business use, but the tradeoffs look like this:
- Dropbox
- Mature security practices, 2FA, SOC certifications, etc.
- Zero knowledge: no. They could in theory access content if forced legally.
- pCloud
- Client-side encryption via pCloud Crypto is a legit plus if you pay for it.
- You keep the key, they can’t read those specific files.
- But only the Crypto folder is zero knowledge; the rest behaves like normal cloud.
If you’re storing client data that is sensitive (legal, medical, confidential IP), pCloud with Crypto is more appealing, but you need to be disciplined about what lives in that encrypted space. Also, Crypto costs extra, which eats into the “cheaper” narrative.
4. Backups vs active workspace
This is where I think the real decision is:
- Active workspace (files you touch daily):
- Dropbox is better as the “live working drive.” Sync, shared folders, comments, conflict handling, all that.
- Cold storage / backups (archives, delivered work, long-term client folders, personal media):
- pCloud wins on price per GB and lifetime plans.
- For backups that you rarely touch, pCloud’s slight clunkiness doesn’t matter much.
A good hybrid strategy, which people weirdly underuse:
- Use Dropbox for current projects and client collaboration.
- Use pCloud as a cheaper archive and backup destination, especially if you like the lifetime plan idea.
5. Local disk space & workflow
Here’s where CloudMounter actually becomes relevant, beyond what @mikeappsreviewer said.
If you hate your SSD getting eaten alive:
- Use CloudMounter to mount Dropbox and pCloud as network drives.
- Keep your “always synced” Dropbox folder very small, only for stuff you truly need offline.
- Everything else sits in the cloud and is pulled on demand through CloudMounter.
That way:
- Dropbox is your “live” project environment.
- pCloud is your big archive / backup.
- CloudMounter stitches them together in Finder / Explorer like they’re just extra disks.
- Your laptop doesn’t melt under 500 GB of client footage.
6. What I’d actually do in your case
For personal + small business with file syncing, client sharing, and backups:
- Heavy collaboration / ongoing client work / multiple people touching the same stuff:
→ Make Dropbox your main workspace. - Large archives, delivered projects, personal photos, long-term backups:
→ Put that in pCloud, optionally with pCloud Crypto for private or sensitive stuff. - To keep this sane and avoid duplicate syncs and full-disk chaos:
→ Use CloudMounter to mount both and access them like external drives.
If you absolutely must choose only one:
- Pick Dropbox if revenue depends on smooth client ops.
- Pick pCloud if cost per GB and semi-private storage matter more than real-time collaboration polish.
I know people love picking a “winner,” but in real use, the combo plus CloudMounter setup tends to hurt the least.
You’re not crazy for feeling stuck between these two. pCloud vs Dropbox is basically “polish and habit” vs “price and control.”
I mostly agree with @mikeappsreviewer and @sognonotturno, but I’d tilt the recommendation a bit if you’re doing both personal and small business.
Here’s how I’d split it, based on what you said: file syncing, client sharing, backups.
1. Speed & daily work
- If your workflow is: “edit file, save, jump to other device, keep working,” Dropbox still wins.
- pCloud is fine, but I’d describe it more as “sync when it gets around to it” if you’re hitting it hard all day.
For active client projects where timing and versioning matter, that small lag is not just annoying, it turns into weird “Do you have the latest version?” moments. That’s where I’m a bit stricter than both of them: I would not rely on pCloud as my only active project drive if clients are paying by the hour.
So:
Active, changing files = lean Dropbox.
Static or rarely edited stuff = pCloud.
2. Sharing with clients
Dropbox is still the “lowest friction” way to hand files to non technical people.
pCloud links are fine but I’ve had more “this page looks weird” or “where is the download button?” replies with pCloud than Dropbox.
If your client work is even mildly repetitive, that friction adds up in support time. That part matters more to a small business than most people admit.
For pure one way sharing (you send files and that’s it), both are OK.
For back and forth, comments, version swaps, Dropbox is just more predictable.
3. Security & region stuff
One thing not really hammered on yet:
- If data residency matters to you (EU clients, GDPR‑sensitive work), pCloud lets you choose EU storage. That can be a real business checkbox.
- Dropbox has strong compliance, but not the same simple “your data lives in Switzerland/Luxembourg” style pitch.
If you handle sensitive client data and you must tick privacy boxes, pCloud + Crypto gives you a cleaner story.
The flip side: Crypto only covers that special folder, and costs extra, so you need some discipline to avoid dumping everything in the unencrypted area and forgetting.
4. Backups vs archive vs “real” backup
Where I slightly disagree with both: neither pCloud nor Dropbox should be your only real backup.
Both are great as:
- Versioned storage
- Offsite copy of working files
- Long term archive of delivered projects
They are not great as:
- Structured, automated system backup where you can restore whole machines or complex folder trees reliably.
If “backups” for you means “I want a second copy of my stuff in the cloud somewhere,” fine, both work.
If it means “I want disaster recovery,” you still want a proper backup tool (Arq, Duplicati, Backblaze, etc.) pointing at one or both.
Personally, I’d use pCloud as long term archive: old client projects, personal photos, final exports.
Dropbox for the current year’s work folder only.
5. Local disk space & juggling both
Since you mentioned personal + business, you will probably end up with both at some point, even if you start with one.
This is where CloudMounter actually pulls its weight:
- Mount Dropbox and pCloud as drives.
- Keep almost nothing “offline synced” except the few folders you really need.
- Everything else stays remote and you open it on demand.
This keeps your laptop from drowning in 400 GB of old projects while still letting you treat those clouds like normal drives.
CloudMounter is not magic, but as a “multi cloud file manager” it turns Dropbox + pCloud into something that feels like one big pool of storage instead of two competing silos.
If SEO matters to you (you mentioned small business, so I’m guessing you care about workflow and not fiddling all day), CloudMounter also helps by keeping your creative / project folders lean and focused, so your local machine stays fast while the bulk lives in the cloud.
6. Concrete setups that actually work
If I had to design your setup without overthinking:
Option A: Single provider, very simple
-
You value speed and smooth client sharing more than money per GB:
→ Go all in on Dropbox, keep your working year online, move older stuff to external drives or a cheap cold storage later. -
You value price per GB and privacy more, and your client work is light or not super time critical:
→ Go all in on pCloud, buy the larger or lifetime plan, add Crypto for sensitive folders, accept that sync may feel a bit “slower.”
Option B: The sane hybrid
- Dropbox: Current client projects, shared folders, files that move every day.
- pCloud: Archives, delivered work, personal media, sensitive stuff in Crypto.
- CloudMounter: The glue that lets you mount both as drives so they don’t annihilate your SSD.
That hybrid is basically the “stop fighting the tradeoffs” approach. Use each tool for what it’s actually good at instead of forcing one to be everything.
If you strip it down to what you actually need (personal + small business, sync + client sharing + backups), I’d frame it this way:
pCloud vs Dropbox: practical split
-
Use Dropbox for:
- Active projects where multiple edits per day happen
- Clients who are not tech savvy
- Simple “click link, see file, comment” workflows
-
Use pCloud for:
- Cheap large storage (archives, media, delivered work)
- Privacy‑sensitive material, especially with their Crypto add‑on
- Long term “cold” storage that you rarely touch
I slightly disagree with how heavily some folks lean on pCloud for active work. On busy days, its sync and conflict handling can feel just inconsistent enough to create confusion with clients. For solo, slower‑paced work it is fine, but for time‑critical collaboration Dropbox still wins.
@himmelsjager and @mikeappsreviewer already covered the behavior of each in daily use quite well, and @sognonotturno hit most of the value/per‑GB points. Where I think they collectively underplay things is disaster recovery: neither pCloud nor Dropbox replaces a real backup tool. Treat them as versioned offsite storage, not your only restore plan.
Where CloudMounter fits
CloudMounter becomes interesting once you accept that you will probably end up using both services:
Pros:
- Mounts pCloud and Dropbox as “network” drives so they behave like external disks
- Saves local SSD space because files are fetched on demand
- Lets you keep business and personal clouds accessible without cluttering your file system
- Reduces the need to constantly tweak each service’s selective sync settings
Cons:
- Adds another layer of complexity and one more app to maintain
- Performance depends on your network, so large files can feel slower than fully synced folders
- Not a backup tool; if Dropbox or pCloud has an issue, CloudMounter cannot save you
- Some apps do not love working directly off a network‑style drive for large, constantly edited files
If your setup is:
- Laptop with limited SSD
- pCloud for archives + backups
- Dropbox for live client folders
then using CloudMounter to mount both and only sync a few local working folders is often the most balanced approach.
Concrete recommendation:
- Heavy client sharing / collaboration, modest storage:
Start with Dropbox only, add a real backup solution. - Growing archives, media libraries, privacy needs:
Add pCloud and move old projects there. - Running both and worried about disk space or juggling multiple apps:
Layer CloudMounter on top to centralize access and keep your drive lean.